Sure, it makes sense that AI can handle some tasks faster. But my gut says it mostly changes jobs rather than taking them over, because people still seem to want a human on the other end for anything that matters. I can't really prove it, but that's how it feels to me.

[No submission - Time expired]

Fair enough that AI automates tasks in baking, sports analytics, and manufacturing. But "taking over jobs" is a much bigger claim than my opponent actually supported. Saying it's used "almost in every field" and is "comparatively smarter" isn't evidence; it's an impression. Automation usually changes what a job includes, and adoption is limited by cost, regulation, and accountability. Plenty of roles still need a human to own the decision when something goes wrong. So the other side needs to show net job losses, not just new tools.