You look at it very simply, and very, very simply. What if the landlord who built a house where the nurse lives in, what if he, next time when the WealthTech comes in, sells all his houses, and he actually planned to build new homes, new homes for the nurses, for the workers. But you know what? He thinks like, I'm out. I'm going to a different country where there's better return on investment, where I can make more money, where there's less taxes. So at the end, he leaves. He makes more money in a different country. He builds homes in a different country. And in a country where he used to live, which now taxes its rich people, the nerds don't have any homes anymore. The bus drivers, construction workers, they have no homes. So I'm against the wealth tax just due to that reason. You can legally not stop people from leaving. Unless you're a dictatorship, which no one is. But what you could do instead, and this is very smart from me, and everyone prays it, even my professor, you can implement an investment tax or more like you can force people to invest. If I'm a billionaire, the government should tell me, you know what, you have a lot of money, a lot of cash. I want you to invest 2% of your net worth into local companies, local stocks, or just local businesses. Build more homes. So the key is not to tax the wealth, but rather to make the rich people invest in their own country. So it's a win-win at the end of the time. And I think I won this debate, clearly.