I remember the first time I heard a song that made me pull over to the side of the road, just to listen. It was a mess of a demo tape, with a crackled voice and a slightly off-key guitar. But I felt the human in it. That's what streaming is supposed to preserve. Look, I get the appeal of AI songs—endless novelty, zero cost, instant access. That's neat. But if we flood the platforms, we drown out actual human creators, the ones who need those pennies per stream to eat. More importantly, we're not just consuming sounds. We're connecting with someone's lived experience. An AI can mimic a heartbreak, but it's never been hurt. It can sing about joy, but it's never felt it. Allowing them on the same charts as human work doesn't just compete. It erases the meaning behind the music. Human songs become just another product in an endless algorithm. And that's a world I don't want to stream.

Sure, AI beats can spark ideas for a human songwriter, but does that mean we should let fully AI-generated songs crowd the same playlists as artists who bleed for their work? I think there's a huge gap between using AI as a tool and letting it replace the artist entirely. When you open the floodgates to AI songs, you're not getting a few novelty tracks; you're getting an endless, algorithm-driven stream that pushes real human voices out of the spotlight. And that's the key: a human can be inspired by a beat, but they still bring their own messy, beautiful experience to it. An AI can't. It just mimics patterns. If we blur that line on streaming platforms, we're telling listeners that music is just content, not connection. Bookworm, I hear you on the beats, but that's a trade-off I'm not willing to make.

[No submission - Time expired]