Among the probability space prior to evaluating the data, a tri-omni mind encompasses less than its negation. Unless those commitments provide explanatory advantages that outweigh their complexity, we have reason to assign the hypothesis a relatively low prior. So, I evaluate its explanatory advantages and disadvantages. What would we expect to be brought about by a tri-omni mind? Without further assumptions, the hypothesis includes a vast range of possibilities. It's unclear why we would expect this hypothesis to bring about the specific data rather than the countless different possible variables that seemingly fall within the range of an all-good/powerful/knowing mind's desires. The specific formation of our biologies and the universe could seemingly be different, non-existent, or better in many ways. For example, the placement of stars and blind spots in human eyes. Even granting specific, mysterious assumptions about this mind's goals, the all-powerful proposed nature of this mind continues to hurt the predictive power of the hypothesis. For example, intelligent or conscious life does not require our specific physical constants, as seen in "electrons in love." If the possible predictions are vauge or require excess assumptions, a hypothesis is less favorable. Another prime example of where additional ad hoc assumptions are needed for the hypothesis to accommodate the data is the problem of evil. This is seen with the various theodicies. And if this mind's desires are "written on our hearts," then it's even further unexpected since the data goes against our moral intuitions. Predation in nature is an effective example. Further things I find unexpected: the vast, hostile emptiness in spacetime, the dinosaurs, various flaws in how we're made, nature's immorality, and divine hiddenness. In summary, the hypothesis of a tri-omni mind creating the universe is less favorable since it has: • Lower initial probability than its negation. • A wide range of possible predictions. • Unexpected data that would require additional posits.