Organized religion does more harm than good. First, it creates an environment in which people are pressured to be a part of religion if the organized religion is ingrained in their community/environment, something that is extremely common for organized religion as opposed to personal religion. Secondly, the idea that it provides a basic moral framework being a desirable thing is flawed; sure, christinaity or islam or hinduism provide "morals" but these morals are often not congruent to what is considered ethical contemporarily. it is indeed true that these organized religions facilitate xenophobia (through christian nationalism, hindutva culture), terror attacks and persecution (hindu suppression of muslim and christian minorities, christian crusades and hate crimes, islamic extremism), and a more disconcerted and disconnected society as a whole. Sure, one can argue that the principles of orgnaized religion may not be bad as a whole, and religions such as buddhism, taoism, jainism, and other smaller organized religions exist and may do some good, when evaluating a resolution like this it becomes imperative to side with the better world. In an affirmative ballot's world, one can understand that organized religion, while on the small scale having some marginal benefit, on a larger scale it is detrimental to society as a whole, excluding personal benefit as its non-topical. the negation ballot's world is one where such nuance is lost, following theoretical principle that hardly works out in practice.

microcosm vs macrocosm. it is evident whose impact wins in this scenario, but it is also important to keep in mind that the resolution does not negate the good being done by religions. firstly, the mass murder, oppression, subjugation, fear, and violence incited by organized religion clearly outweighs regional good through food drives, homeless shelters, and other non-profit/charitable works. these actually increase participants in organized religion, which further contribute to the detrimental effects. secondly, the resolution debates whether the good outweighs the harm. i will concede the fact that there is good that is done through organized religion; but in both my points it becomes clear that organized religion is extremely detrimental, more so than beneficial, to society.

again, you say the same thing over and over again. the regional benefit you state is vastly outweighed by the millions of people killed, oppressed, forced to live in fear, not allowed to get an education or basic human rights/civil liberties, and reduced to mere pawns by groups who use organized religion as a front to increase profit and incite more mass violence and degeneracy.