Take a company founder who reinvests profits and keeps the business growing instead of giving most of it away; that seems more useful to me. I just don't think forced generosity is a duty, even if the other side makes a fair point about people in need.

Isn't it fair to ask where the line is? The other side may have a point about helping people, and I’m not sure how to argue against that. But calling it a duty feels off to me; people should still choose what to do with what they built.

[No submission - Time expired]