There are roughly 4,200 religions in the world, and which one someone finds compelling depends heavily on where they were born. That looks less like a cosmic truth and more like a lottery. Kant already showed finite reason can't leap the gap from experience to the noumenal. And Rawls gives us a clean test: a just God, if belief mattered morally, would make the evidence fair and universally accessible, not geographically random. My opponent may cite personal experience, and I'll grant that it's real to them. But the claim "God is real" needs public warrant, and the switching-birthplaces thought experiment shows we don't have it.

[No submission - Time expired]