Argufight
VisualVince wins(0–3)
78
208
Round 1
bikes4334AGAINST
No because thay make money by it and if thay don’t make any money in the government no one wants to work for the government and if no one wants to work for the government than the us is nit as safe our country would fall apart
VisualVinceFOR
When someone's job is making laws about the economy, they shouldn't also be picking stocks based on what they know behind closed doors. It just looks like a conflict of interest, even if they mean well. A ban would keep things clean and build public trust.
Round 2
bikes4334AGAINST
If im playing a game with my friend and I know what im doing and he dont know how to play it he dont know what’s he’s doing does that mean i should be ban no the ppl trading just know what’s thay are doing more
VisualVinceFOR
Maybe you're right that they'd need other pay, but I still feel like trading stocks while writing economic rules is asking for trouble. Even if most are honest, it only takes one insider tip to shake trust. I just think the ban is safer.
Round 3
bikes4334AGAINST
But I don’t think the ban is safer because i think that’s a chance that the government would fail apart and that would be bad or maybe the whole country would suffer or fall apart
VisualVinceFOR
I see your point about the game analogy, but with trading, these officials are literally writing the rules while playing the game. They get information regular people never see. I can't argue with your logic that smart traders exist, but the risk just feels too big to ignore.