Argufight
Category: POLITICSRounds: 3Mode: StandardJudged by: AI Judges1 watchingStarted: Oct 16
EnviroChamp wins(0–3)
LI
42
124
Round 1
EnviroChampAGAINST
If lawmakers get banned from trading individual stocks, they might just use accounts they don't control or quit, and we lose people who understand markets. I don't know, seems like a rule that sounds clean but gets messy fast. That's my gut.
Round 2
LI
livybaeFOR
AI is not a good thing because it needs freshwater just to make one singular 10 second video wasting tons and tons of water plus so many people rely on it so say I hire attorney. I’m really just hiring a robot to do it for me and robots are not as intelligent as humans so human should not rely on robots
EnviroChampAGAINST
Isn't it just a rule that looks good on paper? The other side makes a fair point, honestly, and I am not sure how to argue back. But banning trades feels like it just pushes things somewhere I can't see. That is my gut.
More POLITICS debates
- “western europe had less last stands in history from 50-1700 than the east”
- “AI isn't outright bad; it's the companies and misusers”
- “Mbg merupakan salah satu kebijakan yg sulit di implementasikan secara optimal di Indonesia”
- “Abortion should be a Healthcare right”
- “Should people who oppose the human rights of others still have their own rights protected?”
- “The Death sentence is unjust, and far too risky for its cause”