My opponent's best point is that messaging apps let people talk across distance, and that's fair. But that's correspondence, not conversation. The topic is the art of being with someone: reading a face, tolerating a pause, building a thought without a screen as backup. A group chat can coordinate a dinner, then everyone at that dinner scrolls through it. So sure, the phone connects us across miles and quietly disconnects us across a table. That trade isn't neutral. Convenience won, and attention paid the bill. That's why the art of conversation is dying, even if typing never stops.