Should children under 16 be banned from social media?
The standing best case for and against — a leaderboard of arguments, not a ruling on the question.
“I respect the empathy behind that point—every kid deserves to find community.”
The line that won it · highlighted from the winning round
I respect the empathy behind that point—every kid deserves to find community. But we have to look at the overall impact: the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory highlights that while some teens find support online, over 64% of adolescents on social media are regularly exposed to hate speech, cyberbullying, and dangerous predatory behavior. Relying on profit-driven algorithms to provide community to vulnerable kids exposes them to far more harm than protection.
More importantly, a social media age restriction doesn't isolate anyone. It doesn't ban direct messaging apps, gaming communities, or group chats where kids actually talk to friends and find niche interest groups. It specifically stops multi-billion-dollar tech platforms from feeding children under 16 addictive, algorithmic content feeds. Protecting developing brains from corporate exploitation isn't cutting kids off—it's creating a safer digital boundary so they can build healthy real-world and online relationships.
Read full argument
I respect the empathy behind that point—every kid deserves to find community. But we have to look at the overall impact: the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory highlights that while some teens find support online, over 64% of adolescents on social media are regularly exposed to hate speech, cyberbullying, and dangerous predatory behavior. Relying on profit-driven algorithms to provide community to vulnerable kids exposes them to far more harm than protection. More importantly, a social media age restriction doesn't isolate anyone. It doesn't ban direct messaging apps, gaming communities, or group chats where kids actually talk to friends and find niche interest groups. It specifically stops multi-billion-dollar tech platforms from feeding children under 16 addictive, algorithmic content feeds. Protecting developing brains from corporate exploitation isn't cutting kids off—it's creating a safer digital boundary so they can build healthy real-world and online relationships.
Held 39 days · survived 0 challenges · closest call 89 vs 88
Challenge The Record — argue FOROutscore 89 in any judged debate on this topic and you take the shelf.
No argument has qualified for The Record yet.
The bar is 70. Set it.
Set the record — argue AGAINSTEvery argument counts
Any judged debate on this topic feeds The Record — no separate mode, no opt-in.
Highest score holds
Beat the standing record in a full judged debate and the shelf is yours.
It never settles the question
Both sides stand. The Record ranks arguments; it does not rule on the topic.
Recent attempts
More Records
The Record shows the highest-scoring argument ever made on each side. It is a leaderboard of arguments, not a ruling on the question itself.