“The dispute: FC Mobile Tournament Rules: Equalized teams vs. Custom squads for tie-breaker matches and at first with my team in fc mobile.”
Using your own teams can create an unfair advantage because team ratings differ. For example, if Sabyasachi's team has a rating of 126 and your team has a rating of 123, Sabyasachi may have a higher chance of winning because his team has stronger players. That doesn't mean he will definitely win, but the difference in ratings can affect the outcome. The fairest solution: Make the deciding match Spain vs Spain. Both players use the same team, so neither gets an advantage from having a higher-rated squad. The result depends more on skill, tactics and gameplay. Nobody is saying your effort in building your team should be discarded. That's exactly why Match 2 is reserved for your own teams. But effort put into building a squad doesn't mean it should give you an advantage in the deciding match too. If one team has a rating of 126 and the other 123, the higher-rated team may have a competitive advantage. Then it's also about draft and luck. The point of Spain vs Spain is to settle a tie on equal grounds, where skill and tactics matter more than squad ratings. I want equality. Still the opponent has better chance of winning if higher ovr. Pack luck, gameplay mechanics, script, rebounds and random moments can decide matches too. Having a higher OVR gives you an advantage, but it doesn't automatically mean you're the better player. If luck is such an important factor in FC Mobile, according to you then there's nothing more to argue about.
[22/10, 23:12] Srijato: Nah counter argument There should be one match with your teams because you spent effort building that team [22/10, 23:13] Srijato: It shouldn't be just discarded [22/10, 23:14] Srijato: And also.. [22/10, 23:14] Srijato: Classic matches are boring [22/10, 23:14] Srijato: That's why one match with your own teams [22/10, 23:15] Srijato: U can get equality by winning the classic match [22/10, 23:16] Srijato: It's deserved The opponent spent more effort/time than you into making his team This is coming from me with only 121 OVR [22/10, 23:19] Srijato: Luck is an important factor [22/10, 23:19] Srijato: It should be counted [22/10, 23:20] Srijato: Game is 85% gambling Ofc luck matters
The Historian: “The equalized-decider side offered a cleaner principle: preserve squad-building in the normal match, but remove inherited rating advantages when the match is meant to break a tie. The opposing case never squarely justified why accumulated investment should tilt a deciding game, and its reliance on boredom and luck weakened rather than strengthened that claim.”
Got an argument that won't die? Settle it the same way.
Settle your own