i support this argument for the following reasons first the general idea for the member of congress is to work for the people so it is something that is out of nature of what the member is supposed to do second these hold important offices that decide taxes, tax break and busiiness laws etc which affect the market they ahev prior knowledge and thus do insider trading which is illegal, which severely affects the stock market as they capitalise this things for a personal gain whu=ich affects the normal day to day stock buyers democracy is for the people not for me and me alone

feeling is just an intuiton i do not care about feelings nor do facts if a regular person is running i would be suprised if they held taxes and even if they did they can just sell them because we must weight the measures nothing is perfect and rejecting something just because it's imperfect is nirvana fallacy, one hand we have got a insider trading of billions of dollar on one hand there is a possibiliy of a man having to sell some stocks and it's not like they might go they get a good salary, why is the president of India barred from owning such business? to ensure impartiality and not fill their own pockets but to serve the people

going to overkill and overkill i gave you the options and now here u are with yo instincts itt's not overkill when we are talking about billions of dollar, we have sen them abusing this in the case of many members such as nancy pelosi etc